Scientia International Journal for Linguistics, Letters, and Arts 8 of 12
though they can live for many years or even centuries. In Barker's representation of the dead, fragile figures
also appear who need to protect themselves from humans.
This construction of the representation of the monster is related not only to literature or other artistic
expressions, but also as part of society itself. It can be observed that "the monster has taken on different
meanings and forms over the centuries" (Messias, 2016, p. 55). Therefore, it is known that monsters "are
constructions that relate to the era and culture that produced them" (Ribeiro, 2021, p. 36). The monster, thus,
is associated with fear or a form of threat, which may or may not have some supernatural element. The
monster is defined "in opposition to humanity. It is its mortal enemy, the one against which it can only react
by extermination" (Nazário, 1998, p. 11). In this sense, "most of the attributes of monstrosity are in clear
opposition to the attributes that define the human condition. Others are aspects of this condition taken in
isolation and subjected to a plastic treatment of exaggeration" (Nazário, 1998, p. 11).
Returning to Midian, it is known that it was a place that welcomed “monsters,” largely criminals in
search of some kind of redemption. In the book, it is stated: “Midian was like a place of refuge; a place to be
taken. And more: a place where any sins they had committed – real or imagined – would be forgiven” (Barker,
1994, pp. 29-30). Boone, the protagonist of the book, wants to escape from suffering and newly discovered
crimes he allegedly committed. With that, he sees Midian as "a place to go, where he could finally find
someone who understood the horrors he was enduring" (Barker, 1994, p. 34).
This representation brings into conflict a duality in Boone's nature. In this process, it is stated that
when the protagonist heads for Midian, "the man Boone and the monster Boone could not be divided . They
were one; they traveled the same road in the same mind and the same body. And whatever lay at the end of
that road, death or glory, would be the fate of both” (Barker, 1994, p. 40). However, upon arriving in Midian,
he discovers that he did not commit the crimes he was accused of; he was not a “beast” or a “monster.”
Therefore, in this case, Boone could not be part of that place nor could he enter Midian. Boone insists that he
is a monster, but ultimately, if he does not belong there, he should be devoured. In his confusion and agony,
he discovers that “even there, among the monsters of Midian, it was not his place. And if it wasn’t there,
where was it?” (Barker, 1994, p. 51).
In this regard, we see a subversion that Barker makes in relation to classic narratives, after all, “in the
Western canon, every monster wants to integrate into the society in which it is created, since its identity, or
at least its existence, depends on it” (Vugman, 2018, p. 33). Boone, on the contrary, considering himself a
monster, wants to integrate into that hidden community which, in the face of persecution suffered in previous
centuries, hid from society. At one point, Barker (1994, p. 115) states: “There were few hiding places where
the monstrous could find peace.” And that was not the place for Boone.